Guarding you cannot check is guarding you are taking on trust, and trust is what runs out around month nine. Start with evidence a committee member can read in five minutes before a meeting.
The reporting pack is where a guarding contract becomes auditable. Attendance shows whether the manpower you are paying for turned up. Patrol records show whether the rounds happened. Incident reports show what was done about the things that went wrong. The monthly dashboard puts all three in front of your committee in one document.
It is also how a chairman defends the security line at an annual general meeting. Owners asking why maintenance charges went up are far easier to answer with twelve months of attendance and incident data than with an assurance that things have improved. The same pack is what you want on file if a dispute ever reaches the Commissioner of Buildings.
Resident names, identity card numbers and vehicle details are masked before anything leaves the site. Under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 the obligation sits with your Joint Management Body as much as with us, which is a quiet reason to be careful about which agency holds the building’s records and where.
Guard name, shift, clock-in and clock-out, location and status for every post, daily.
Checkpoint clocking with route, time completed and photo evidence from the round.
The buku log written during the shift and open to audit by your committee or managing agent at any time.
Date, location, category, action taken and the follow-up that closed each case, including any PDRM report reference.
Every complaint recorded with the corrective action against it, so a pattern is visible before it becomes a motion at the AGM.
Attendance, patrol, incidents, complaints and corrective action in one summary, formatted for tabling at a committee meeting.
Volunteer committees under the Strata Management Act 2013 who have to answer owners with data, not impressions.
Agents reporting across several properties who need one consistent monthly format they can rely on.
Where the outgoing agency’s performance is contested and the building needs a documented baseline from day one.
Yes, and ask every agency you shortlist for the same thing. A sample with the client details removed tells your committee more about how a company runs than the whole proposal does.
Where a site supports it, attendance records carry time, date and location. The technology is the easy half. Whether anyone reads the record and acts on it is the half that decides whether your guards turn up, and that is what supervisor inspections and the monthly review exist to force.
Names, identity card numbers and vehicle details are masked before anything is shared beyond the site, and the full records stay with the property. Under the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 the obligation falls on your committee as much as on us, so it is a fair question to put to every agency on the shortlist.
The service most Malaysian properties are really buying.
Read more Roving CoverA patrol without fixed checkpoints and fixed timings is a guard going for a walk.
Read more EscalationA break-in, a fire alarm, a medical case in the lift lobby or a fight at the gate.
Read moreSend the property name, how many entry points you have and the shift pattern you run now. You get back a written proposal with the guard count, the roster and the monthly figure. If a smaller deployment does the job, we will say so in the same message.
Request a Site Assessment